Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 LastLast
Results 451 to 500 of 550

Thread: Vegans and eggs

  1. #451
    elve
    Guest

    Default Re: If A Monkey Made you a Sandwich, would you eat it ?

    Quote horselesspaul View Post
    Eggs, wherever sourced, are not vegan.
    Hope this helps.
    yeah I know they're not vegan, but the spirit of veganism is surely to avoid harming or exploiting animals? Taking eggs from animals that don't need them, would lay them anyway, and who have in addition been saved from slaughter and a miserable battery farm existence, couldn't be classed as exploitation or harm.

    Chickens lay an egg a day till they have a 'clutch' to hatch out - they wouldn't miss a couple of eggs from that clutch, especially if you replace them with china eggs. They're not intelligent enough to anticipate babies and then be disappointed when they don't get any - so where's the harm?

    Not that I'd eat eggs anyway - yukky concept - but it does no harm if it's a rescue chicken IMO (whereas buying new chooks specially for free range eggs would of course involve breeding and culling males in the first place)

    These ex-battery chickens are desperately in need of good homes - I'd love some myself if I had more room - but if I had to choose between binning their surplus eggs or eating them I guess I'd eat them if it didn't nauseate me.

  2. #452
    Good sperm
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sarf Lahndn
    Posts
    851

    Default Re: If A Monkey Made you a Sandwich, would you eat it ?

    The eggs aren't ours for taking. When I have chickens I'll hardboil the eggs and feed them back to the chickens so they can regain the energy and calcium they lost making them.

  3. #453

    Default Re: If A Monkey Made you a Sandwich, would you eat it ?

    My concept of veganism isn't just limited to least harm on the other; but also about keeping the mind and ethics of the vegan least harmed too.

    So while in your scenario, an egg might not directly cause much harm to the chicken, your scenario does two things that do cause harm to the one taking the eggs and those in society around him/her. 1) It promotes the idea that humans continue to use animals without consent due to our differing abilities. 2) It promotes, tacitly, the idea that humans would need eggs at all by the shear effort of tricking the bird.

    So in the short term, stealing that egg would cause no harm to the "emotional state" (if I can call it that) of the chicken. However, while little harm would be done to the bird, that harm easily translates to the taker of the egg, and the rest of society around that person.

    For me, veganism isn't just about the relationship I have with animals, but also about the relationship the humans around me have with me as well as their relationship with animals. Veganism isn't just a personal life decision for me; it is a political act in solidarity with all animals not just in an effort to abstain from direct oppression, but to change the way all animals interact with one another.

    So while the harm is minimized in your example, the relationship between "master" and "slave" isn't.
    context is everything

  4. #454

    Default Re: If A Monkey Made you a Sandwich, would you eat it ?

    Quote absentmindedfan View Post
    The eggs aren't ours for taking. When I have chickens I'll hardboil the eggs and feed them back to the chickens so they can regain the energy and calcium they lost making them.
    This.
    ..but what would they do with all the cows?..

  5. #455
    IRBFUIPTHITCS Fungus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    161

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    I just hate the assumption that 'eggs are there for us to eat [but on a side not I wont because I want to save the animals etc]'
    I just dont see in any way why someone would want to in the first place .. but thats just me I guess ..
    As I said, it assumes that we have the right to take the eggs anyway..
    Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe-Albert Einstein

  6. #456
    missbettie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Oak View, California, United S
    Posts
    1,650

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    I just can't ever get over the idea when people say that a certain animal isn't intelligent enough, so they can do certain things to it.

    What about people? Some people aren't very intelligent, what about mentally disabled people? Can we do whatever we want to them? Can we kill them? No because that would be inmoral. So whats the difference with animals?

    Or my other fav way to explain it, I don't know if any one here can speak or understand chinese...so if you can forgive me! But if you can't...then should we do away with everyone that speaks chinese? We can't understand them, so they must not have that high of intelligence (which is CERTAINLY UNTRUE).

    To me its pretty much the same thing. You shouldn't exploit something or kill something because you deem them unintelligent or can't understand them.

    I hope everyone understands my ramble, and my intention was not to offend anyone just so you know!
    "i'm rejecting my reflection, cause i hate the way it judges me."

  7. #457
    snivelingchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Lafayette, Louisiana, United S
    Posts
    1,022

    Default Re: If A Monkey Made you a Sandwich, would you eat it ?

    Quote elve View Post
    Chickens lay an egg a day till they have a 'clutch' to hatch out - they wouldn't miss a couple of eggs from that clutch, especially if you replace them with china eggs.
    They miss out on nutrients. It takes a LOT of calories and energy to lay an egg. Each egg takes an hour to lay. It's sort of like giving birth. Naturally, birds do not lay eggs every day. These birds were bred to do so. The thing about breeding, is that changes are made faster than evolution can correct for.

    To keep a chicken at it's healthiest, you would have to give it conditions that would make it lay as few eggs as possible, and have a diet VERY rich in calories and nutrients.

    Eggs are very dense with calories and nutrients, that's why they are so unhealthy for us. Allowing them to eat the egg is natural. This is what birds to with fertilized eggs that die, and what most mammals do with miscarriages and dead infants.

    Plus, I don't like the idea of taking the eggs and replacing them with fakes. FIRSTLY, if you have to replace them, then surely they have a use beyond yours, and are not 'wasted' by someone not eating them. SECONDLY, it seems as wrong as taking a bees honey and replacing it with sugar (which also has health implications because the honey they make contains trace minerals on a scale thats influential in insects, that sugar does not).

    Lastly, if a chicken does not eat its egg, it would decompose into the ground, contribute to nourishing the soil, which would contribute to healthy soil insects, and insects that feed off the plants that grow there, which benefits the chicken that eats the insects.

  8. #458
    Yoggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    674

    Default Re: If A Monkey Made you a Sandwich, would you eat it ?

    Quote snivelingchild View Post
    Eggs are very dense with calories and nutrients, that's why they are so unhealthy for us.
    This is so true! I can't STAND the commercials touting eggs as "nature's perfect food"
    "Man can do as he wills, but not will as he wills" - Arthur Schopenhauer

  9. #459
    Aurore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    144

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    i agree. in fact since my childhood i have always been told i should never eat too much eggs because of that. i also hate when people take eggs for granted, you know. just because they come from chicken they think it's natural, and consequently normal, to eat eggs. since i was a kid i can't help but think if i hold an egg it will break and a chick will come out asking why i want to eat him. childish, but try eating one after.

  10. #460
    pavotrouge
    Guest

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    plus, eggs are disgusting. I've always felt weird eating them, they're slimy chicken's periods, at the least.

  11. #461
    Yoggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    674

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    Quote Aurore View Post
    i agree. in fact since my childhood i have always been told i should never eat too much eggs because of that.
    Unfortunately I just read a study that "debunks" the myth that eggs are bad for your cholesterol. They did a study that showed that people who ate one egg a day actually ended up with lower "bad cholesterol" than those who didn't. But I'm extremely reluctant to believe any conclusions without knowing the details of the study. Remember that "dairy helps you lose weight" study? They had 2 groups of overweight people: one group just exercised, and the other group exercised, ate yoghurt, and reduced their calorie intake. Then there was the study that said kids who eat cereal with milk for breakfast performed some % better in school and had more concentration -- compared with kids who didn't eat breakfast at all .
    "Man can do as he wills, but not will as he wills" - Arthur Schopenhauer

  12. #462
    Aurore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    144

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    lol, true, you never know if the study's neutral or prejudiced. even if they're not bad for your cholesterol, eww for eggs.

  13. #463
    CATWOMAN sandra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Emerald Isle
    Posts
    2,506

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    Quote missbettie View Post
    I hope everyone understands my ramble, and my intention was not to offend anyone just so you know!
    I understand you missbettie and agree with everything you have said!
    I like Sandra, she keeps making me giggle. Daft little lady - Frosty

  14. #464
    snivelingchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Lafayette, Louisiana, United S
    Posts
    1,022

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    Quote Yoggy View Post
    Unfortunately I just read a study that "debunks" the myth that eggs are bad for your cholesterol.
    Unless they've debunked the fact that dietary cholesterol raises blood cholesterol, and that eggs contain cholesterol, then it's a pretty useless study. It's probably one of those that says 'it's not THAT bad for you' by redetermining what 'in moderation' is and trying to see JUST HOW MANY BAD THINGS WE CAN DO without being TOO BAD. As if disease happens precisely when habits cross the line of 'too bad'. Like that one cigarette that actually causes the lung cancer, or that one ray of sun that causes skin cancer. It has nothing to do with your body as a whole, NO! it's individual actions that determine your health.

  15. #465

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    It's unethical to eat eggs whether the chickens are being reared well or not. Vegans do not eat eggs! End of story!

  16. #466
    seitan
    Guest

    Default Re: If A Monkey Made you a Sandwich, would you eat it ?

    Quote elve View Post
    yeah I know they're not vegan, but the spirit of veganism is surely to avoid harming or exploiting animals? Taking eggs from animals that don't need them, would lay them anyway, and who have in addition been saved from slaughter and a miserable battery farm existence, couldn't be classed as exploitation or harm.

    .
    so, i guess youd be happy to eat roadkill too, or your dog when it dies of old age?

    meat, eggs and dairy are NOT food.

  17. #467
    seitan
    Guest

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    Quote Yoggy View Post
    Unfortunately I just read a study that "debunks" the myth that eggs are bad for your cholesterol. They did a study that showed that people who ate one egg a day actually ended up with lower "bad cholesterol" than those who didn't. But I'm extremely reluctant to believe any conclusions without knowing the details of the study. Remember that "dairy helps you lose weight" study? They had 2 groups of overweight people: one group just exercised, and the other group exercised, ate yoghurt, and reduced their calorie intake. Then there was the study that said kids who eat cereal with milk for breakfast performed some % better in school and had more concentration -- compared with kids who didn't eat breakfast at all .
    im always sceptical with these studies, as they are more than likely carried about by the industries themselves.

  18. #468
    Yoggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    674

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    Quote snivelingchild View Post
    Unless they've debunked the fact that dietary cholesterol raises blood cholesterol, and that eggs contain cholesterol, then it's a pretty useless study. It's probably one of those that says 'it's not THAT bad for you' by redetermining what 'in moderation' is and trying to see JUST HOW MANY BAD THINGS WE CAN DO without being TOO BAD. As if disease happens precisely when habits cross the line of 'too bad'. Like that one cigarette that actually causes the lung cancer, or that one ray of sun that causes skin cancer. It has nothing to do with your body as a whole, NO! it's individual actions that determine your health.
    I found a link to the article. Their "conclusion" is that dietary cholesterol can raise blood cholesterol, but it's too much saturated and trans fat that "generally contributes more" to unhealthy serum cholesterol levels. And "eating one egg a day isn't unhealthy for healthy adults". Sounds exactly what you said snivelingchild: they're saying that while it is bad for you, it's not that bad, and there are worse things to eat. And that if you're already healthy to begin with, eggs won't be bad for you
    "Man can do as he wills, but not will as he wills" - Arthur Schopenhauer

  19. #469
    yum! angelamc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    los angeles
    Posts
    230

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    Quote Yoggy View Post
    Unfortunately I just read a study that "debunks" the myth that eggs are bad for your cholesterol. They did a study that showed that people who ate one egg a day actually ended up with lower "bad cholesterol" than those who didn't. But I'm extremely reluctant to believe any conclusions without knowing the details of the study. Remember that "dairy helps you lose weight" study? They had 2 groups of overweight people: one group just exercised, and the other group exercised, ate yoghurt, and reduced their calorie intake. Then there was the study that said kids who eat cereal with milk for breakfast performed some % better in school and had more concentration -- compared with kids who didn't eat breakfast at all .
    Hardly anyone only eats 1 egg when they have eggs. It's they same way with that stupid dairy campaign. It makes me angry that these adds are so misleading about health. Most people who eat eggs have 2 or 3 at breakfast in the form of scrambled eggs or an omelet. Most people have no idea how "large" a single serving of dairy is. The average American consumes waaay more than the daily recommended allowance of dairy or eggs. What those adds should really be saying is, "studies show that people who don't over-eat have lower cholestrol and lower weight."
    Duh.
    And how can anything that contains as much cholesterol as an egg be touted as being "good for you"???

  20. #470
    yum! angelamc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    los angeles
    Posts
    230

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    Quote pavotrouge View Post
    plus, eggs are disgusting. I've always felt weird eating them, they're slimy chicken's periods, at the least.
    Agreed.
    Eggs have a terrible after-taste! They're like morning-breath!

  21. #471
    AR Activist Roxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    4,977

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    Someone was bugging me the other day, about my veganism and went on to describe their "delicious" breakfast of fried eggs. I was annoyed at them, so told them that I hoped they liked their chicken's periods.

    They of course were totally grossed out and so then I explained to them what an egg was, and just as I don't eat human periods, I don't eat chicken periods either.

    They shut up after that.

  22. #472
    Ex-admin Korn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    4,830

    Default Vegans and eggs

    Quote elve View Post
    monkeys aside, I wouldn't have a problem with eggs if the chickens were ex-battery rescues otherwise destined for slaughter, and if they had a lovely lifestyle.....
    Hi Elve...
    vegans don't see 'lovely lifestyle' as a valid reason or excuse to own, control or abuse birds, humans or animals, just like vegans don't think it's OK to kill and eat an animal 'because it have had a happy life, so what's wrong with it' - a commonly comment heard from non-vegans when eating wild animals are being discussed.

    This opposition against ownership may be hard to understand, because an egg isn't part of a chicken's body, once it is outside. The chicken won't feel any pain if the egg is eaten, just like I won't feel any pain if someone eg. would cutting my hair. I still feel that what should happen with my hair or nails is up to me, and if it's true that shaving someone actually stimulates hair growth (I don't know if this is true), there is another parallel to laying eggs, because taking an egg from a chicken stimulates/increases egg production. I'd even say that even if stimulating/increasing the egg production would be an enjoyable, orgasmic experience for a chicken, her eggs would still not be ours more than the semen from a human orgasm/ejaculation would be for others to use freely - even if the male would enjoy the increased production of semen as a result of others 'taking' the semen he already produced. Veganism isn't only about suffering. I'm sore most girls wouldn't enjoy that that someone stole their eggs either, even if this would have been possible in a 100% painless manner.


    A major problem for chicken is that an artificially high egg production actually causes pain, bleeding and is probably also contributing to increased risk of some of the complications some chicken experience, like eggs that are stuck inside the chicken, which can cause severe bleeding. Personally I wasn't aware of this until a occasionally saw an interview with someone working at a chicken farm which main job was to remove the blood from the eggs before they were sold.

    A typical hen lays 256 eggs pr. year (1998), but in 1888, that number was 100. Gallus bankiva, also called Gallus Gallus or Red Jungle Fowl - the ancestor of most domestic chicken - lay from six to ten eggs a year. We have no right to do anything that will increase that number, and removing an egg from a chicken will influence it's egg production rate.

    Regarding unfertilized eggs, you may have seen Sniv's post earlier in this thread about wild birds never laying eggs that aren't fertilized....

    Natural instincts are lost under domestication, and while some domesticated breeds won't even sit on their eggs, wild birds normally work hard to protect their eggs.

    Even if you would have an egg laying chicken that for some reason just couldn't stop producing eggs, it would be better (better than eating them) to give them to someone who eats eggs - this way they'd buy less eggs from factory farms or so called 'free range' farms. It would even be better to sell them to a health food store and buy vegan food for the money, and this way both support ethical food production and decrease amount of commercially produced eggs.

    I'm closing this thread soon - please start a new one if you want to, but this has become so long that I guess many visitors won't even start reading it.

    Here are some links about the free range myth:
    "Free Range" Eggs - Can You Tell The Difference?
    The Faces of Free Range Farming.

    We also have this thread:

    Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

  23. #473
    yum! angelamc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    los angeles
    Posts
    230

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    Quote Roxy View Post
    Someone was bugging me the other day, about my veganism and went on to describe their "delicious" breakfast of fried eggs. I was annoyed at them, so told them that I hoped they liked their chicken's periods.

    They of course were totally grossed out and so then I explained to them what an egg was, and just as I don't eat human periods, I don't eat chicken periods either.

    They shut up after that.
    You mean you don't eat your own period??
    *puzzled*

    menstrual jam...now available at whole foods next to to the eggs
    Last edited by angelamc; Feb 28th, 2008 at 12:09 PM. Reason: stupid computer

  24. #474
    Yoggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    674

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    Quote angelamc View Post
    Hardly anyone only eats 1 egg when they have eggs.
    True, but I imagine that most people who eat eggs don't eat them every day, so they probably average about 1 a day. (I'm not defending the ridiculous "study", but I don't think that 1 egg a day is unrealistically low for most people who eat eggs).
    "Man can do as he wills, but not will as he wills" - Arthur Schopenhauer

  25. #475
    CATWOMAN sandra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Emerald Isle
    Posts
    2,506

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    People often forget though that there are eggs in other things they eat like biscuits and cakes. So, although they might only eat 1 egg a day, they are in fact eating a lot more in other types of food.
    I like Sandra, she keeps making me giggle. Daft little lady - Frosty

  26. #476
    Yoggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    674

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    Quote sandra View Post
    People often forget though that there are eggs in other things they eat like biscuits and cakes. So, although they might only eat 1 egg a day, they are in fact eating a lot more in other types of food.
    Perhaps, but most cakes only have 2 eggs for the whole cake, so one slice is only a small fraction of an egg. Unless they eat the whole cake, then they'll be in trouble
    "Man can do as he wills, but not will as he wills" - Arthur Schopenhauer

  27. #477
    Ex-admin Korn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    4,830

    Default Ovo-veg*nism? No thanks.

    I've recently read that US citizens on average eats circa 250 eggs per year. A domesticated chicken who is producing circa 250 eggs per year (this is normal, based on an over-production rate of circa 32, meaning that she produces 32 times as many eggs as her wild ancestor, Gallus Bankiva) will therefore - with a lot of pain, blood and frustration - produce enough eggs to feed one human pr. year until she is considered useless, killed and made into eg. baby food or pet food, normally after only a year or two.


    From The Poultry Guide:
    "A hen which lays one egg every day is a very good layer."

  28. #478
    CATWOMAN sandra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Emerald Isle
    Posts
    2,506

    Default Re: Vegans and eggs

    That is so sad Korn. I wish every single human being could realise the horror of those facts.
    I like Sandra, she keeps making me giggle. Daft little lady - Frosty

  29. #479
    Manzana Manzana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    429

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    Just to put a slightly different spin on things...

    what is more cruel, to kill a happy or an unhappy animal (or person)?
    Personally, if i was unhappy i'd be more willing to die!

    THis answer normally makes organic meat eaters confussed at the very least!

    Just to clarify, I am TOTALLY against organic meat. I think it's an AWFUL way to make people feel good about totally taking advantage of other beings and killing them for their own pleasure... Organic slaughter houses do not look any different from normal ones...

  30. #480
    Klytemnest
    Guest

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    Quote Manzana View Post
    Just to put a slightly different spin on things...

    what is more cruel, to kill a happy or an unhappy animal (or person)?
    Personally, if i was unhappy i'd be more willing to die!

    THis answer normally makes organic meat eaters confussed at the very least!

    Just to clarify, I am TOTALLY against organic meat. I think it's an AWFUL way to make people feel good about totally taking advantage of other beings and killing them for their own pleasure... Organic slaughter houses do not look any different from normal ones...
    I agree that "organic" meat and "cage-free" eggs, etc. are somewhat about alleviating the burden of guilt, guilt that - as far as I am concerned - should not be alleviated by the thought that the slaughtered animals were treated relatively humanely.

    On the other hand, I would prefer that animals be treated humanely - even if their humane treatment makes some people feel that it is therefore OK to slaughter the animals. After all, the number-one reason I became a vegan was to decrease the amount of unnecessary suffering in the world. I keep thinking about my dear cat Paolo, whom we put to sleep over a year ago. I wanted him to have the best life possible. I want the same for the millions of innocent animals that are doomed to execution.

  31. #481
    Zan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    51

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    Utopia to me would be a world where no animals were used, abused and slaughtered to be eaten.
    But we live in the real world and I don't expect to see Utopia in my lifetime. I want an end to the terrible suffering of factory farming, and I think to attempt to ban it you have to put something in its place. That's where free range--truly free range---farming comes in. It has got to be better for the animals if they live a happy life, where they can behave naturally for their species in a natural environment with no suffering before they are killed.

    It is like the difference between concentration camps and nice enlightened open prisons where you can do what you want within certain limits. I don't want any animals imprisoned, but since they certainly are going to be for some years to come getting rid of the concentration camps and treating them with respect and dignity in their lifetimes has got to be a step in the right direction.
    I do what I can and that's better than doing nothing

  32. #482
    cobweb
    Guest

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    i agree, zan, i do take an abolitionist stance myself but in my heart i feel glad to see animals living out what lives they have outdoors with access to natural foods and the company of their own kind.

  33. #483
    erfoud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    San Sebastián (Spain)
    Posts
    61

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    Quote Zan View Post
    It is like the difference between concentration camps and nice enlightened open prisons where you can do what you want within certain limits. I don't want any animals imprisoned, but since they certainly are going to be for some years to come getting rid of the concentration camps and treating them with respect and dignity in their lifetimes has got to be a step in the right direction.
    The snag is,this improvement on the conditions these creatures live in may lead to general acceptance of animal exploitation, so that the animal lib movement would be hindered. "Happy" animal consumption should be flatly rejected, as Francione masterfully pointed out. This whole welfarist stuff runs counter to abolition

  34. #484
    Zan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    51

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    Quote erfoud View Post
    The snag is,this improvement on the conditions these creatures live in may lead to general acceptance of animal exploitation, so that the animal lib movement would be hindered. "Happy" animal consumption should be flatly rejected, as Francione masterfully pointed out. This whole welfarist stuff runs counter to abolition
    Actually I believe there is already general acceptance of animal exploitation.

    " This whole welfarist stuff runs counter to abolition"?-----------

    On the contrary---i believe that the more animals are viewed as sentient beings with needs and emotions the more likely people are to stop eating them. Intensive sytems allow the animals to be viewed as nothing more than units of meat production---because their needs are denied them and they continue to exist, people can de-animalise them in their heads.

    I do personally flatly reject "happy" animal consumption---I would rather starve to death, but the real world keeps on turning and anything that ends intensive farming should be enouraged.
    I do what I can and that's better than doing nothing

  35. #485
    erfoud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    San Sebastián (Spain)
    Posts
    61

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    It´s the hot debate among abolitionists, Zan.
    In some cases (It happened to me) the welfarist approach may lead people to evolve and realise any way of animal exploitation is unethical, whereas some may be satisfied with using and consuming animals whose situation is deemed acceptable.
    in this way, as a matter of fact it´s hard to predict how people might react to the step -by -step approach, but I definitely believe that the best way to fight for animals is to campaign for abolitionism, that is, outright animal liberation so that animals aren´t seen as "goods" anymore

  36. #486
    cobweb
    Guest

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    i agree with the abolitionist stance in principle but i want to see less suffering right now.

  37. #487
    Zan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    51

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    Quote erfoud View Post
    It´s the hot debate among abolitionists, Zan.
    In some cases (It happened to me) the welfarist approach may lead people to evolve and realise any way of animal exploitation is unethical, whereas some may be satisfied with using and consuming animals whose situation is deemed acceptable.
    in this way, as a matter of fact it´s hard to predict how people might react to the step -by -step approach, but I definitely believe that the best way to fight for animals is to campaign for abolitionism, that is, outright animal liberation so that animals aren´t seen as "goods" anymore
    My stance is abolitionism but I would hate to think my ideals would condemn millions of animals to lives of terrible suffering because I could not be pragmatic enough to accept that the move from intensive to free range systems would be a huge improvement for those animals personally. Anyone who has seen intensive farming first hand and has any compassion would want to end their suffering----now! I fear it is a kind of arrogance to condemn millions more to suffer in that way for the greater good---which frankly is a goal that belongs in the Utopia I mentioned earlier --- rather than support a move away from intensive farming.
    It is completely unrealistic to expect the world to suddenly realise that we vegans are right and animals are not "goods".To hold out for all or nothing means you are actively supporting the continued suffering in factory farms, and in fact plays right into the hands of the multi nationals behind intensive farming. Most major changes come about step by step---e.g. universal suffrage. First only the gentry could vote, then men with land, then "common" men, then women over thirty etc. etc. If everyone had said right at the beginning that they didn't want the vote going to anyone else unless everyone over the age of 18 got it, I am sure the gentry would have been highly delighted because they would have had a perfect excuse to continue with the status quo. Likewise to demand an end immediately to all use of animals is easily dismissed by the multi nationals and the meat industry, so we have no weapons to fight them with.
    I do what I can and that's better than doing nothing

  38. #488
    erfoud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    San Sebastián (Spain)
    Posts
    61

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    Quote Zan View Post
    To hold out for all or nothing means you are actively supporting the continued suffering in factory farms
    Well, I couldn´t disagree more with this view, and besides, I consider it offensive to abolitionists. Anyway, it´s up to you to hold these crappy views...

  39. #489
    Manzana Manzana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    429

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    Quote Zan View Post
    so we have no weapons to fight them with.
    Plenty of weapons... I do not buy organic or free range meat/eggs/milk and that is because i do not support them. If everyone did the same, would they exist?

    I think factory farming is better in some ways than organic because it makes people uncomfortable. Plenty of people would be vegetarian if it wasn't because their conscience feels better by buying "happy flesh"...

  40. #490
    Zan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    51

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    Quote erfoud View Post
    Well, I couldn´t disagree more with this view, and besides, I consider it offensive to abolitionists. Anyway, it´s up to you to hold these crappy views...

    Okay---you say I have crappy views. I won't be as rude to you, but I do believe the total abolitionist or nothing stance is idealist, abstract to the point of being existential with no hope of becoming reality, which is why I think it supports continued suffering.
    I do what I can and that's better than doing nothing

  41. #491
    Zan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    51

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    Quote Manzana View Post
    Plenty of weapons... I do not buy organic or free range meat/eggs/milk and that is because i do not support them. If everyone did the same, would they exist?

    I think factory farming is better in some ways than organic because it makes people uncomfortable. Plenty of people would be vegetarian if it wasn't because their conscience feels better by buying "happy flesh"...
    Obviously, what I meant was because total abolition of the use of animals now is such an alien concept to the majority of people that it is easy for the multi-nationals to dismiss it. Factory farming doesn't make nearly enough people uncomfortable---because it is out of sight it is out of mind. People LIKE being able to buy their meat cut up, wrapped in plastic and unrecognisable as animals from the supermarket---if they were forced to see the animals and the meat as animals I believe more people would change.

    Your weapons are not buying free range meat and eggs? Well obviously neither do I --I have been vegan for a very long time---I don't feel I am doing anything to help the animals suffering in factory farms by doing so.
    I do what I can and that's better than doing nothing

  42. #492
    erfoud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    San Sebastián (Spain)
    Posts
    61

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    By saying so - that abolitionists are supporting continuing suffering in factory farms- you´re being far ruder than me. Sometimes plain sentences are more offensive than swearwords, don´t you think?

  43. #493
    Ex-admin Korn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    4,830

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    It's totally possible to
    a) claim that using causing any kind of suffering for others - humans or animals - isn't ethical (when other solutions are 'practical and possible')
    b) try to live according to this viewpoint
    c) agree that 'less harm' is better than 'more harm'
    d) decide that one wants to promote 'no harm' instead of 'less harm', even if one at the same time knows that we won't see a world free from any harm caused by humans in our lifetimes.

    It is completely unrealistic to expect the world to suddenly realise that we vegans are right and animals are not "goods"
    This could be said about all people with healthy, ethical ideals. Some ideals may never be realized ever, and many will not be realized in this or the next generation, and none will be realized 'suddenly'. But is that an excuse to not to try to realize these goals? I'm pretty sure that the very existence of a vegan movement is a main reason that many non-vegans think that eating animals who have had a good life is better than eating animals that have been suffering. They may feel guilty for causing the suffering they do, are not ready for going vegan (or at least they think they aren't ready), and make a move towards a less cruel solution. You don't need to need work for 'animal welfare' in order to promote animal welfare, the best way to inspire non-vegans to work for animal welfare is to keep insisting that we have no right to cause the death or suffering of any animals at all.

    we live in the real world and I don't expect to see Utopia in my lifetime.
    Not only are lots of the improvements we see in today's society a result of a process that started many generations ago, they are also a compromise between an ideal solution and what can be done right now. If nobody would promote the ideal solution, the compromises would most likely be even less worth than they are today.

    Vegans are in the unique situation that we represent opinions that are still relatively new to most people, at least in the Western world. If we don't promote these viewpoints, nobody will.

    On the contrary---i believe that the more animals are viewed as sentient beings with needs and emotions the more likely people are to stop eating them.
    That's not in any way a contradiction to veganism! I support veganism not because I wanted animals to have larger cages or listen to nice music while they're stuck inside a cage, but because it just doesn't make sense to harm anyone - human or non-human - if you don't want to be harmed by anyone. The vegan solution (no factory farms, no free-range farms, no hunting) is better for all involved parts, is more environment friendly, feel more right, is more logical, make more sense economically (the list is endless); so why would I spend time trying to promote anything but only solution I support? That would have been a perfect way to kill the vegan movement; just convince all vegans that nothing will happen 'suddenly' or that nothing will be perfect, and use this as some kind of pseudo-argument for not promoting 100% respect for animals. Every hour, event amount of money a vegan spends on promoting animal welfare means less time and resources spent on promoting a viewpoint only we can promote.

    There are lots of people who feel guilty about using animal products, and they'll probably feel better if they would buy organic meat or 'free range' chicken, or support organizations that are not vegan, but who try to improve the conditions animal farms live under. If they do their best, and we do our best, we... all do our best. That must be the best solution, because while we can do what they do (say that it's better if animals have larger cages etc., and promote changes in that direction), they can't do what we do (say that animals shouldn't live in cages at all, and promote a vegan lifestyle).... Well - they can do what we do, but they won't because they aren't vegans - which is why vegans have to keep focusing on what's unique for vegans.

    I can spend resources on improving the life of a goat, or I can spend resources on promoting the idea that humans shouldn't do anything that makes goats or any other animals suffer at all, so for me, the choice is easy. I don't think the vegan movement should commit an 'ethical suicide', and instead start working for something millions of others can work for.


    ...idealist, abstract to the point of being existential with no hope of becoming reality
    If a man hits a woman, should we tell him to hit less often, or not so hard, or should we tell him that we don't think he has any right to hit anyone at all? Should we stop working against violence (against women, children, political prisoners...) if unless we would assume that we would see a totally non-violent world? Is the statement "a non-violent world is idealist, abstract to the point of being existential with no hope of becoming reality" a valid reason to accept violence, to not promote non-violence, or to start promoting a 'don't hit so hard'-movement?

  44. #494
    cobweb
    Guest

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    i think that, no, the vegan movement should definitely NOT spend resources trying to make farming less hellish for the animals, and should instead take the abolitionist stance which is the only option, really.

    however, myself, in private, though i would describe myself as an abolitionist, i take some tiny crumb of comfort when i see real free-ranging animals in contrast to those imprisoned in dank, stinking hell-holes. that's the difference between a paper exercise and reality, and probably the difference between myself as a human and myself as a part of the vegan movement.

  45. #495
    Zan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    51

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    I live a vegan lifestyle and firmly believe that the use of all animals by humans is wrong. At the same time I do think that animals who are going to die for humans anyway, despite what I think about that,could at least have a decent quality of life in a truly free range system rather than an existence of torture, pain and misery in an intensive one. I don't see a contradiction with being a vegan and caring about the suffering of those individual animals in intensive systems now.In fact, as I said before, I believe that an acceptance that all animals need to be treated with respect is inevitably a step towards not using them, and if everyone accepted that intensive systems were wrong that is an achievable step towards a respect for life.

    Quote:
    Not only are lots of the improvements we see in today's society a result of a process that started many generations ago, they are also a compromise between an ideal solution and what can be done right now. If nobody would promote the ideal solution, the compromises would most likely be even less worth than they are today. ( sorry ---haven't worked out how to quote properly)

    I do think the ideal solution should be promoted, but I also think now is a great time in history to make the compromise of outlawing all factory farming now.

    On your next point---I don't think I was ever coming from the stand that the Vegan movement should spend resources on promoting farm animal welfare. I just accept that, as a vegan, some harm that other huimans do to animals is a lot less than other harm they do, and I wouldn't want to discourage less harm by an all or nothing approach.


    Quote:
    If a man hits a woman, should we tell him to hit less often, or not so hard, or should we tell him that we don't think he has any right to hit anyone at all? Should we stop working against violence (against women, children, political prisoners...) if unless we would assume that we would see a totally non-violent world? Is the statement "a non-violent world is idealist, abstract to the point of being existential with no hope of becoming reality" a valid reason to accept violence, to not promote non-violence, or to start promoting a 'don't hit so hard'-movement?

    I'm sorry but I don't accept this analogy. Although the death and misuse of these animals is the same, truly free range animals could have a really good quality of life, so it isn't a matter of hitting less hard. If I see an animal suffering I step in and help it---I want to make it well so that it can return to living a life where it can fulfill all its natural potential. Are you saying that if someone took you to an intensive pig unit ------and told you that, on your say so, these actual individual pigs would be moved to green grass, mud wallows, the right to bring up their piglets without farrowing crates, that they wouldn't have their tails and teeth cut off , but that they would still be killed and eaten----that you would say no, leave them in this concentration camp of misery ?
    I do what I can and that's better than doing nothing

  46. #496
    cobweb
    Guest

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    ^ that's my point and it's not a 'crap' opinion atall, it's the opinion of someone who knows animals and cares about their lives right now.

  47. #497
    Ex-admin Korn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    4,830

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    Quote Zan View Post
    I believe that an acceptance that all animals need to be treated with respect is inevitably a step towards not using them
    Hm... do you agree that the only way to treat them with respect is to not use them at all?


    I do think the ideal solution should be promoted, but I also think now is a great time in history to make the compromise of outlawing all factory farming now.
    The amount of enough people who actually respect animals today is IMO way too low to get acceptance for such a suggestion in governments and parliaments throughout the world. The demand for animal products is so also currently extremely high - the number of eg. chicken and meat consumed daily is so high that converting the production methods into something that would be remotely close to what the animals deserve would demand such a big revolution, so much money, and such a dramatic increase in price on the final animal products that 'this time in history' realistically means that animal products would be extremely expensive. Farms, transport... practically everything would have to be restructured, rebuilt. Even if we would be able to convince every government and person on the planet to invest a lot of money and resources in improving the conditions for animals that later should be killed, these investments would later be used as an argument for stop using all these 'enhanced' farms. Less suffering is always better, but what we suggest in terms of respect for respect for animals is nothing less than a revolution, and even if this (stop using animal products) is a revolution that would free up a lot of money that could be used elsewhere, what you suggest seem to be two, not one revolutions. First, a revolution thats very expensive and requires a lot of investments... investments that won't have any value if people should start to accept that we have no right to keep animals in cages or kill and eat them.


    it isn't a matter of hitting less hard.
    Anything but allowing all animals to roam freely would be 'hitting' them with restrictions. Taking calves away from the mothers as a part of the milk production procedure is also 'hitting' them. Killing them is also an insult to their rights.

    Are you saying that if someone took you to an intensive pig unit ------and told you that, on your say so, these actual individual pigs would be moved to green grass, mud wallows, the right to bring up their piglets without farrowing crates, that they wouldn't have their tails and teeth cut off , but that they would still be killed and eaten----that you would say no, leave them in this concentration camp of misery ?
    I think you misunderstand me... first of all, my opinion doesn't matter here, because they're not going to ask me. Of course I want as little suffering as possible for everyone. I'm just discussing where vegans should have their focus, and what we can do. I know non-vegans who treat their animals quite well, according to the common definition of 'well', and of course I'm not going to ask them to treat their animals worse so more people can go vegan because animals are treated badly.

    If someone ask me what my opinion is, I'm going to say that we shouldn't kill or harm animals at all, we should not eat organic meat/eggs, and I'm not going to change my opinion to something else than just only to become popular, 'realistic' or because I'm only for 'sudden' improvements. If people who defend animals give the impression that medium improvements are acceptable, we'll see small improvements. People are so generally afraid of being 'extreme' or support 'extreme' viewpoints, and therefore try to position them in the middle. If you place all the arguments and viewpoints about animals on a scale from 1 to 100, and 100 is total respect for animals, someone has to take the position of promoting and defending those viewpoints, and who can do this better than vegans? If we don't, if we create an impression that better farms is acceptable, we just moved the '100', and the result, the compromise - the 'middle way' - will be closer to '0'.


    What do you mean by "total abolitionist or nothing stance" in terms of stuff that's relevant to real life situations? How can a stance against all human and non-human slavery harm animals 'support continued suffering'? Nobody will call up vegans every month before they make decisions about changes in factory farms, and ask us if we are for or against more comfortable cages. Realistically, I'm for both a total and to suffering in the long run, and an immediate reduction. If I see an animal suffer today, I'll try to help it, just like I would try to help a suffering human. I'm not going to suggest to anyone that animals should continue to suffer in order to make more people vegan.


    Obviously, what I meant was because total abolition of the use of animals now is such an alien concept to the majority of people that it is easy for the multi-nationals to dismiss it.
    Getting rid of apartheid in South Africa was considered quite 'alien' at some point as well. The same was the right to vote for women. If a hippie would say in 1968 that "in less than 40 years from now, the man who actually were-to-become the president of the USA would travel around the world and talk about ecology and reduction of pollution the same way we do today", people would say that it would be totally unrealistic. The existence TV channels dedicated to rock was probably considered utopian before MTV. The same is true for a lot of other stuff, like eg. mobile phones: "Are you saying that everyone will carry a little thing in their pocket that allows them to talk anyone they want, even in other countries? Get real!"

    What would happened with the relationship between UK and India if someone would convince Gandhi that he was reaching for non-reachable goals? And - do you think the American slaves would find it 'realistic' that USA ever should get a non-white president? I'm all for totally reaching for the 'un-reachable'...

  48. #498
    Zan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    51

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    I think I have said my piece and am now in danger of going round in circles and repeating myself. To answer you though:

    Hm... do you agree that the only way to treat them with respect is to not use them at all?

    Yes I agree, but to the animals themselves there are degrees of respect. I believe it is possible for animals to be treated with enough respect in a freerange system to have a good quality of life. There is no respect for them at all in intensive systems---they aren't even treated as living creatures.

    You say----I'm all for totally reaching for the 'un-reachable'---but yet earlier you talk about the impossiblitity of "two revolutions"---one move away from intensive farming and then a complete end to using animals. I'm all for reaching for the "un-reachable" as well, but realistically expect it to take a while. If it means two revolutions so be it.I still think that getting people to see animals as sentient beings is a step towards our ultimate goal, rather than allowing them to de-animalise them in factory farms. All the unreachable goals you mention being achieved had little steps along the way---i believe ending intensive farming and changing to free range not only has huge benefits for the actual animals at the time, but would be a step on the way to the ultimate goal.

    Korn we actually agree:

    Realistically, I'm for both a total and to suffering in the long run, and an immediate reduction. If I see an animal suffer today, I'll try to help it, just like I would try to help a suffering human. I'm not going to suggest to anyone that animals should continue to suffer in order to make more people vegan.

    But to me that means getting as many animals out of intensive units as possible. Erfoud seemed to be suggesting that would be against veganism because it would be supporting free range farming---that's when I said to support an all or nothing stance was to condemn animals to continue suffering.

    I became vegan for the animals, not because I wanted to follow an ideology---I want to end suffering.




    I do what I can and that's better than doing nothing

  49. #499
    Ex-admin Korn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    4,830

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    Quote Zan View Post
    I believe it is possible for animals to be treated with enough respect in a freerange system to have a good quality of life.
    Well, I disagree, for several reasons. Animals want to be free, just like humans, and not live in cages - small or large. Chicken don't want to lay 2-300 eggs per year; the natural amount for them is 8-10 eggs per year. Imagine how non-profitable the egg industry would be if they would lay only 8-10 eggs per day and in addition roam freely - outdoors. Birds and animals have feelings, just like humans, and I don't think a life in a concentration camp, where you regularly see your mates disappear in large amounts belongs to the same sentence as 'good quality life'. There are so many humans around that want such a high amount of animal products that if the production process would convert into what some people call humane, not only would the industry hardly be profitable, it would require a lot of water and other resources, and much more land than it does today.

    I'm all for reaching for the "un-reachable" as well, but realistically expect it to take a while. If it means two revolutions so be it.
    That's fine. If we agree that factory farm owners won't call you and me and ask for our opinions, my concern is what your possible disagreement with some of the statements posted by others in this threads means in terms of real life changes. Do you suggest that vegan activists and promotors should spend less time on promoting veganism, and more time on helping animals in factory farms? IF not, what is the difference between your and my viewpoints?

    I'm all for helping animals and humans that need help, but main focus is on 'priority'. Whatever I do, whoever I help, there will be someone else - human or non-human - that need my help: Imagine you're driving a car on a highway, and you see a dead mouse along the road. You observe it, don't like what you see, maybe it even upsets you that humans use cars, because this means that animals will be killed. Now, imagine that you see a dead child along the road. If you are like me, you'll pay more attention to the situation than if it was a mouse. You'll stop/call the police/report it... in one way or other you'll do do anything but just keep driving. We prioritize constantly, and that's the way it has to be. Priority/focus is extremely important, and if vegans should prioritize they're time and resources into helping chicken getting slightly larger cages, they are choosing something else away (in terms of the same time, the same resources). One could argue that by helping factory animals, or even by promoting veganism, one is choosing not to spend the same resources and time on helping humans in need. All we do is about focus and priority, which is why a situations where vegans should promote use of organic meat or free range eggs would be really absurd the way I see it.


    Realistically, I'm for both a total and to suffering in the long run, and an immediate reduction. If I see an animal suffer today, I'll try to help it, just like I would try to help a suffering human. I'm not going to suggest to anyone that animals should continue to suffer in order to make more people vegan.
    But to me that means getting as many animals out of intensive units as possible. Erfoud seemed to be suggesting that would be against veganism because it would be supporting free range farming---that's when I said to support an all or nothing stance was to condemn animals to continue suffering.
    I think it's more complicated than just 'supporting' this or that, because 'support' is a very general term. 'Support' can eg. be about opinions only. not about activities. If you are a surgeon, and the society around you needs more surgeons, would it make sense to stop being a surgeon and instead start driving a taxi - if you enjoy being a surgeon? Surgeons have their special education (which not a lot of others have), just like vegans have their special ethical platform (which not a lot of others have). Driving taxi is a very useful thing to do, you may save lives by driving a taxi, you may help people home when they're drunk or reach a plane when they're short in time. I could easily come up with many other examples than taxi driver, but the point is that both surgeon and vegan would can do something for others that not a lot of others can.

    What if all the 'classical' vegetarians - Albert Einstein, Gandhi, Leonardo da Vinci, Henry David Thoreau, Albert Schweitzer, Benjamin Franklin and so on - would busy rescuing a mouse here and a chicken there instead of dedicating their time to what was truly genuine for these people?

    Of course we are not robots, and won't calculate the results of every action we do, but by large, I think vegans getting involved in animal welfarism instead of vegan activism is a really bad idea.

    This doesn't mean that I'm against vegans donating money to whatever they feel can help humans or animals the environment - it's just that if the few vegan activists that are out there would focus entirely on veganism, this would make lot more sense than if they'll rather use energy on other activities that easily can be done by others) rather than promoting their rather unique viewpoints. If we think that there are too few vegans around, we can only blame ourselves, because we are the only group that really can do something about it.



    I became vegan for the animals, not because I wanted to follow an ideology---I want to end suffering.
    Sure, but I don't think I'll end suffering if I manage to give a chicken a slightly larger cage to live in before he is killed by a machine, because when he is out of that cage, a new chicken will be put into it - until people will stop eating chicken. It will take longer before people stop eating chicken if those with healthy arguments/viewpoints against eating chicken are busy in factory farms working for minor improvements.

    I truly believe that the total effect of showing others what kind of lives these animals live has a stronger effect than trying to make their lives on the death row more comfortable. I also doubt that people who is against death penalty, and who want to contribute to get an end to it, have any doubts that the best thing they can do is to try to convince people and politicians not to support death penalty...

    If changes happen in people's consciousness - the other, necessary (material etc) changes will follow. If we change the physical conditions only, and there's no change in people's consciousness, we are only treating symptoms - and I'm all for doing something with the cause. The main cause of chickens suffering is that people buy chicken meat and eggs, because if they wouldn't, there wouldn't have been any market for chicken farms.

    People have been trained to not respect animals, or even believe that we need to make them suffer and die. Some people even believe that if they stop eating animals, they'll have to practice an ascetic lifestyle, spend more money on food or even become sick. It's just so much vegans can do that nobody else can - things that will help both humans, animals and the environment. Luckily, more and more non-vegans accept that they don't need animal products, but we wouldn't have been there today if we would have got lost in 'welfarism'....

  50. #500
    Zan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    51

    Default Re: Why are organic eggs/meat unethical?

    Circles...........

    I did say right at the very beginning "truly" free range. I am not talking about keeping animals in slightly larger cages. I don't know why you have labelled me as "welfarist" because that is not where I am coming from.

    Birds and animals have feelings, just like humans, and I don't think a life in a concentration camp, where you regularly see your mates disappear in large amounts belongs to the same sentence as 'good quality life'.

    Yes they certainly have feelings, but not exactly like humans---that verges on anthropomorphism. I value animals too highly to think of them as furry or feathery little humans. Everything is relative and there is no comparison between the conditions in intensive farming and animals who are truly free range and can roam in large fields with their families. That is the beginning and end of my point---yes, I want an end to all animal abuse and use, but on the journey there a move to free range is surely a good thing.

    Circles circles.........
    I do what I can and that's better than doing nothing

Similar Threads

  1. Vegans and eggs: here's the short, one-paragraph version!
    By Korn in forum QUESTIONS FROM NON-VEGANS
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: Oct 30th, 2011, 11:40 PM
  2. Kinnerton eggs?
    By refinnej in forum UK
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: Mar 19th, 2010, 01:23 PM
  3. Eggs
    By ComplexZeta in forum QUESTIONS FROM NON-VEGANS
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: Nov 28th, 2007, 07:58 PM
  4. Creme eggs
    By Lyns in forum VEGAN FOOD
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Jan 25th, 2006, 09:35 PM

Tags for this thread (If you see one or more tags below, click on them if you're looking for similar threads!)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •