Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 78

Thread: Global Warming

  1. #1

    Default Global Warming


    Global Warming goes from opinion to fact

    Posted Jun 29, 2006 PM ET


    The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case about global warming climate change.

    The Bush Administration could face a legal challenge over its regulation of carbon dioxide emissions as the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case brought by Friends of the Earth US, numerous state and city authorities and NGOs.

    The groups are questioning a 2003 ruling by the Environmental Protection Agency that disavowed its jurisdiction under the Clean Air Act to regulate global warming carbon dioxide emissions.

    If the court rules against the EPA, the legal status of carbon dioxide in the US would be clarified as climate changing – a position continually denied by the Bush Administration.

    "This case could have far reaching consequences for climate change policy in the USA," said Friends of the Earth International vice-chair, Tony Juniper. "The Bush Administration's has used scientific uncertainty as a major reason against taking structured action on global warming."

    Norman Dean, Executive Director, Friends of the Earth United States said that the Supreme Court's decision to hear this case could be a watershed moment in the fight to stop global warming, and went on to say,"The US government's wait and see approach to global warming pollutants isn't working."

    http://www.halflifesource.com/site/n...rticle7215.htm

  2. #2
    Limey
    Guest

    Default Re: Global Warming goes from opinion to fact

    well jesus it's about time.

    Can't wait to hear what happens to this.

  3. #3
    Juice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    203

    Default Re: Global Warming goes from opinion to fact

    Bush has his head too far up his ass to notice it's getting warmer elsewhere.

  4. #4
    Limey
    Guest

    Default Re: Global Warming goes from opinion to fact

    Thanks for posting this Jane.

    A friend of mine and I are thinking of going to some democratic meetings and whatnot around here. I just can't deal with that man and all his lemmings anymore.
    This is my brilliant post for the night.

  5. #5
    coconut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    209

    Default Re: Global Warming goes from opinion to fact

    Fingers crossed FOTE win.

  6. #6
    Pilaf
    Guest

    Default Re: Global Warming goes from opinion to fact

    It's definately getting warmer, but I'm reserving judgement on just how much humanity has to do with it. It's still a very big possibility that the Earth is simply returning to its normal temperatures after the last ice age. Those things take thousands of years to fully recede.

  7. #7
    Michael Benis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Brighton, UK
    Posts
    195

    Default Re: Global Warming goes from opinion to fact

    Quote Pilaf
    It's definately getting warmer, but I'm reserving judgement on just how much humanity has to do with it. It's still a very big possibility that the Earth is simply returning to its normal temperatures after the last ice age. Those things take thousands of years to fully recede.
    Bit of a coincidence, though, that's it's speeded up so much since the industrial revolution isn't it? And that the pace is getting faster and faster and appears linked to CO2 emissions?

    Cheers

    Mike

  8. #8
    veggiewoman
    Guest

    Default Re: Global Warming goes from opinion to fact

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5130538.stm


    Last Updated: Sunday, 2 July 2006, 15:06 GMT 16:06 UK
    E-mail this to a friend Printable version
    Long-haul birds 'returning early'

    By Catherine Owen



    The barn swallow performs long migrations

    Birds that migrate long distances have adapted to the world's changing climate in unexpected ways, a study shows.
    As the planet warms, and spring arrives earlier in Europe, birds are being forced to change their migration patterns.
    It had been thought that birds travelling long distances from Africa to Europe would be unable to adapt.
    But a study in Science suggests they have evolved in response to climate change and are returning earlier.
    The need for migratory birds to coincide their arrival at breeding grounds with plentiful food supplies is a known evolutionary pressure.
    Scientists had assumed that birds travelling short distances would be better able to adapt - and arrive earlier for spring - because of similar climate conditions in their nearby winter grounds.
    Long-migrating birds arrive at least as early as short-migrating birds


    Nils Christian Stenseth, University of Oslo

    But researchers in Europe decided to test this theory, using long-term banding and observational data from Scandinavia and Italy dating back to 1980.
    The study revealed that long-distance fliers have adjusted their migration habits to arrive earlier in northern Europe in time for the start of spring.
    This suggests a more permanent change in migratory behaviour due to climate change than previously thought.
    'Surprising' response
    Study-co-author Nils Christian Stenseth, from the University of Oslo in Norway, said migration in the species studied was thought to be a biological response triggered by day length, and not climate variations, in breeding grounds.
    CLIMATE CHANGE AND BIRDS
    Evidence suggests warmer oceans are affecting the diet of seabirds
    Birds whose populations rely on hatching two clutches of eggs a year may be hit hard
    Migration and breeding of birds such as the puffin is moving out of step with food supplies

    "Long-migrating birds arrive at least as early as short-migrating birds," he told the BBC News website.
    "The trigger is probably related to the length of day, or the photoperiod.
    "Birds typically respond to the right photoperiod for bringing up as good offspring as possible."
    The birds begin to reproduce at just one year of age and so have the potential for a rapid genetic response to recent environmental events.
    They are showing a "surprising and interesting evolutionary response to climate change", he added.
    The research is the latest in a string of studies looking at the widespread effects of climate change on birds. Dr Paul Donald, senior research biologist at the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, UK, said populations of long-distance migrants breeding in the UK and across Europe were showing worrying declines. "This study highlights the potential role climate change is playing," he said. "However, we must not ignore other potential factors affecting their fortunes here in the UK or on their wintering grounds in Africa."

  9. #9

    Default Re: Global Warming goes from opinion to fact

    I think doing any little bit helps. Global warming happening or not, all the pollution going in the air/earth has got to be bad. Personally, I believe we have a serious issue on our hands, but so many people just dont want to hear it.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Global Warming goes from opinion to fact

    From the Discovery News channel:

    Rising Ocean Acidity Threatens Reefs

    July 5, 2006 — The same manmade gases that are heating up the planet are also making oceans acidic enough to dissolve the skeletons and shells of many marine organisms, according to a new scientific report released Wednesday.

    Already ocean surface concentrations of carbonic acid – created by excess atmospheric carbon dioxide dissolving into the water – are high enough to eat away the skeletons of many vital reef-building corals and microscopic "calcifiers," like caulk-making phytoplankton and tiny marine snails.

    "The (acidity) changes that are occurring in the oceans are truly extraordinary," said Joan Kleypas, a marine ecologist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and a coauthor of the July 5 multi-agency report entitled Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Coral Reefs and Other Marine Calcifiers. "It will continue to change as long as carbon dioxide is rising."

    Atmospheric scientists around the world agree that the additional carbon dioxide in the air and oceans has come from exponential growth in fossil fuel burning emissions since the start of the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century.

    Current carbon dioxide levels are higher than they have been for at least 650,000 years, according to ice core data from the Arctic and Antarctic.
    Ocean acidity has already increased 30 percent since the start of the Industrial Revolution in the early 19th century, said Richard Feely, an oceanographer at NOAA’s Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory in Seattle.

    By the end of the 21st century that could go up to 150 percent, he said.
    "This is not controversial," said Kleypas, referring to the current acidity levels. There’s an overwhelming amount of data backing it up, she said.
    What isn’t known very well, however, is just how rise in acidity will change overall ocean chemistry, how much carbon dioxide the oceans can ultimately absorb, and how marine organisms will respond.

    "We don’t know whether they can adapt or not," said Victoria Fabry, a marine biologist at California State University at San Marcos. At present the only studies of marine organisms under higher acidity have been done in laboratories.

    "At the moment we can only speculate," Kleypas added. "We should start addressing these questions immediately."

    The sooner the better, said Feely, who pointed out that many affected organisms are also food sources for many commercially important fish – like salmon.

    It could also pose a critical problem for coastlines protected by coral reefs, said Chris Langdon, a coral researcher at the University of Miami.
    Rising acidity inhibits the buildup of skeletons that form the foundation of reefs, said Langdon. So acidification will likely lead to reef erosion and expose shorelines to the direct assault of waves.

    Add rising sea level to the picture and things start looking pretty ugly, he explained.

    Also at risk are 25 percent of the world’s marine species, which spend some part of their lives on reefs, said Langdon.

    "Coral reefs are kind of like the rain forests of the ocean." And like rain forests, they are home to organisms that produce pharmacologically useful compounds – like the anti-AIDS drug AZT, he said.

    The new report is the result of years of work by scientists worldwide and was assembled by top researchers at the US Geological Survey (USGS), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), and universities.

    The work will also appear in the next report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.


    http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2006/0...20060705170030

  11. #11
    my3labs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Seattle, WA (USA)
    Posts
    163

    Default Re: Global Warming goes from opinion to fact

    There's a very interesting documentary playing here in the US (don't think it has opened yet overseas). It's called "An Inconvenient Truth", hosted by Al Gore. My husband and I saw it last weekend and I highly recommend it.

    http://www.climatecrisis.net/
    You are not required to complete the task of repairing the world, neither are you free to abstain from it.
    --Pirke Avot

  12. #12

    Default Re: Global Warming goes from opinion to fact

    An Inconvieniant Truth was an excellent presentation and was a great way to get hold of the publics attention! Everyone should see it if they can

  13. #13
    my3labs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Seattle, WA (USA)
    Posts
    163

    Default Re: Global Warming goes from opinion to fact

    I agree. My husband had no interest in seeing it but was really glad that he did. I'm taking my youngest daughter (also vegan) to see it this weekend.
    You are not required to complete the task of repairing the world, neither are you free to abstain from it.
    --Pirke Avot

  14. #14
    Kiran's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    692

    Default Re: Global Warming goes from opinion to fact

    Schwarzenegger and Blair unite on global warming

    From Smh.com.au

    Arnold Schwarzenegger and Tony Blair share the stage at a news conference in Long Beach, California, to announce their climate change strategy.


    Gerard Wright in Los Angeles
    August 2, 2006

    THE Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and the British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, have struck an agreement to bypass the Bush Administration and work together to fight global warming.

    The unprecedented deal was sealed at a meeting on Monday that featured an all-star cast of entrepreneurs, among them James Murdoch, second son of the News Corporation founder, Rupert Murdoch; Anthony Pratt, chairman of the Melbourne company Pratt Industries USA; the co-founder of Google, Sergey Brin; and Virgin's Richard Branson.

    The "nation state" of California, as Mr Schwarzenegger repeatedly referred to it, and Britain will create a market for the trading of carbon emissions, and share economic and scientific research on climate change and non-polluting technology.
    Mr Blair and Mr Schwarzenegger were unequivocal about the reason for their union: the newly popular and urgent issue of global warming.
    "The evidence of climate change and its danger is overwhelming," Mr Blair said. "It is very hard for anyone to dispute it."

    Mr Schwarzenegger, running for his second term as governor, went further: "We saw that there isn't leadership from the Federal Government when it comes to protection of the environment."

    The Governor's reference was aimed directly at the White House, which has refused to sign the Kyoto Treaty designed to set restrictions on carbon emissions, and has shown no inclination to enter any international debate on the subject.

    Sir Richard said later: "I think businesses can influence leaders who are not worrying enough about our grandchildren."

    Also pointing to the Australian Prime Minister, Sir Richard said: "I'm afraid that Bush and [John] Howard, when it comes to global warming, stand out somewhat. Even China is actually doing better than those two leaders."
    In the absence of national leadership, American states are making their own decisions about energy conservation.

    Last year, California announced its intention to reduce carbon emissions to 2000 levels by 2010, and to 1990 levels by 2020, a reduction of 25 per cent. In a sense, it was a meeting of two world powers. Britain is ranked fourth among the world's economies. California is fifth.

    But the announcement offered little in the way of detail. Among the areas where California is expert is in the design and enforcement of emission standards, regarded as the toughest in the US. Britain can be expected to offer guidance on the trading of carbon credits, where a company with carbon emissions below an agreed limit can trade that difference with a company that has exceeded the limit. This is a relatively recent practice in the US. Such a trading market also exists on the Sydney Futures Exchange.

    Mr Brin said the presence of political and business leaders answered the claim by countries such as Australia and the US that the treaty would put them at an economic disadvantage.

    "Any signals, milestones, acknowledgement about this issue, particularly the acknowledgement that we can improve the environment and the economy at the same time, is a very strong message," Mr Brin said.
    Life is like a boomerang: What goes around comes around - "Karma"rocks!

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    85

    Default Global Warming: The Real Truth

    Ok, wow I'm on a roll, third topic today...anyhoo back on topic, there appears to be at least two sides on the issue of Global Warming. One group says basically it exists and that CO2 is one of the major contributors, whilst the other group says, nonsense, the world warms and cools reguarily(coolin now) and that in fact, CO2 levels are a direct result of the earth warming or cooling and not the other way around. What sayest thou?

  16. #16
    Andy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Yorkshire
    Posts
    80

    Default Re: Global Warming: The Real Truth

    The group that say its due to human activity = most of the worlds scientists.

    The group that say its due to natural processes = mainly media outlets who would rather give their readers stories that they want to read instead of than the truth, it makes for better sales

  17. #17

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    85

    Default Re: Global Warming: The Real Truth

    Quote Andy View Post
    The group that say its due to human activity = most of the worlds scientists.

    The group that say its due to natural processes = mainly media outlets who would rather give their readers stories that they want to read instead of than the truth, it makes for better sales
    Hmm I don't know, I've seen scientific evidence, therefore scientists who claim otherwise. Evidence like sunspots, and historical charts measuring climate change...again I am no expert, I'm looking for facts.

  18. #18
    seitan
    Guest

    Default Re: Global Warming: The Real Truth

    im always curious of who is doing the research, and what gains they may have from the results.

  19. #19
    Andy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Yorkshire
    Posts
    80

    Default Re: Global Warming: The Real Truth

    yes the earths temperature does change naturally but the issue is the speed of the change that is occurring now, the world is warming up far faster than before.

    Only a few individual scientists deny the IPPC's conclusion that human activity is effecting global temperatures, or say that the human contribution is insignificant. On the other hand an overwhelming majority of scientists working on climate change agree with the IPPC, with the main criticism actually being that they are too conservative with their predictions.

    A few papers have suggested that climate change could be due to changing solar activity, and this is due to research carried out by just 2 scientists but there has been no increase in solar brightness since the 1970's, so that can be petty much ruled out unless we are talking about ultra violet radiation?

    Unfortunately the few scientists who disagree with global warming just get far more media attention. You would struggle to find any articles denying global warming because of human activity in scientific journals, where articles have to be well researched and actually have proof to back up their claims lol.

    What do you think?

  20. #20
    seitan
    Guest

    Default Re: Global Warming: The Real Truth

    well, being the misanthrope i am, i cant help believe that humans are to blame for the way the erath (and skies) are changing.

  21. #21
    Andy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Yorkshire
    Posts
    80

    Default Re: Global Warming: The Real Truth

    well, when you consider that the troposphere which includes 75% of the worlds atmosphere is only 10 miles thick I would think that the amount of pollution we are pumping into it would quite clearly have an effect, even if that effect is just an addition to natural process.

    couldn't you just direct your misanthropy at the GW deniers instead

  22. #22
    muxu bero bat! gogs67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    edinburgh
    Posts
    929

    Default Re: Global Warming: The Real Truth

    Quote Vegabond View Post
    Hmm I don't know, I've seen scientific evidence, therefore scientists who claim otherwise. Evidence like sunspots, and historical charts measuring climate change...again I am no expert, I'm looking for facts.

    If thats from the Oregon Institute then i'd take it with a HUGE pinch of salt. 30,000 scientists signed their petition debunking global warming they claimed, and yet if you look into it anyone with a degree in ANY discipline can sign it! Sociology, Art History, Management fecking Studies - it doesnae matter! Scientists my ass.

    But it crops up every 15 minutes as proof positive that the big bad environmental lefties were bullying the poor wee industrialists all along.
    Show me an online petition with 30,000 meteorologists and I'll be impressed.


    As for the historical charts, using them is actually, to me, the most frightening proof of something wrong.!! According to Earths eliptical orbit we hit an ice age every 125,000 years with a roughly 10,000 year warm period inbetween which tails off to cooler times. We should be in that tail off period just now and yet the earths temp is rising. Why? We're not 100% sure but the fact is, it is rising when it shouldn't be!




    Facts???

    The strongest evidence yet that global warming has been triggered by human activity has emerged from a major study of rising temperatures in the world’s oceans.

    The present trend of warmer sea temperatures, which have risen by an average of half a degree Celsius (0.9F) over the past 40 years, can be explained only if greenhouse gas emissions are responsible, new research has revealed.

    The results are so compelling that they should end controversy about the causes of climate change, one of the scientists who led the study said yesterday.

    "The debate about whether there is a global warming signal now is over, at least for rational people," said Tim Barnett, of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, California. "The models got it right. If a politician stands up and says the uncertainty is too great to believe these models, that is no longer tenable."

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...icle516033.ece

    Scientists have found the first unequivocal link between man-made greenhouse gases and a dramatic heating of the Earth's oceans. The researchers - many funded by the US government - have seen what they describe as a "stunning" correlation between a rise in ocean temperature over the past 40 years and pollution of the atmosphere.

    http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0219-01.htm

    A friend of mine postdoc-ed with someone who went on to work for Mario Mollina at MIT who I got to meet. That group has published some seminal work in the field, particularly where CFCs are concerned, with Mollina ultimately receiving the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for it. The guy eventually went onto Scripps Oceanographic Institute as well. These groups believe this is a real phenomenon and their data is both empirical and convincing. I certainly believe what they publish and i know there is no ulterior motives to the research i've seen other than the truth!
    Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty!

  23. #23

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    85

    Default Re: Global Warming

    I don't think this guy is from Oregon, but you never know...

    http://www.iarc.uaf.edu/news/news_sh..._testimony.php

    Thank you for providing me with the opportunity to testify at this important hearing today.

    In order to avoid any misunderstanding, I would like to state at the outset that it is in the best interests of mankind to reduce the rate of increase of our release of CO2. My talk is about the interpretation of the recent trends in the Arctic. For this purpose, I would like to demonstrate that:

    1. Prominent climate change is in progress in the Arctic, compared with the rest of the world. However,
    2. arctic climate change consists of both natural change and the greenhouse effect, and thus
    3. it is incorrect to conclude that the present warming in the Arctic is due entirely to the greenhouse effect caused by man.
    4. Therefore, it is important to find out the contribution of both natural and manmade components to the present climate change in the Arctic.
    It is also important to note that both the Arctic and global temperatures began to decrease in about 1940, when our release of greenhouse gases began to increase rapidly. Thus, the increase-decrease between 1920 and 1970 must be natural change. One important task we have is to find out the nature of the warming periods from 1920 to 1940, and from 1970 to the present time. An important question is whether or not the present rise will continue or whether future temperatures will decrease, as was the case during 1940 to 1970.
    The IPCC Arctic Group, headed by V. Kattsov, examined the IPCC model simulations of Arctic temperature change for about the same time. Their results are shown in the right-hand side of Figure 2. The simulation results bears no resemblance to the observed, real temperatures in the continental Arctic. If the simulation were reasonably accurate, the results should be similar. This is the most quantitative test to date to examine if the continental arctic warming during the last half of the last century was caused by the manmade greenhouse effect. This comparison shows clearly that much of the prominent warming in the continental Arctic after 1970 was not caused by the human-induced greenhouse effect.

    If, in fact, the continental warming indicated in the right-hand side of Figure 2 were caused by the greenhouse effect, this trend should have been intensified during the last few decades. However, that is not the case. The continental warming in the upper part of Figure 3 (which is similar to the left-hand side of Figure 2) is absent during the last 20 years (the lower part of Figure 3). Thus, the continuous increase of the warming is not taking place any more. Instead, intense warming is now in progress in Greenland, which experienced cooling in the recent past.
    In conclusion, the nature of the climate change after 1970 should be a matter of great debate. It should not be assumed that this short period of warming is entirely due to the greenhouse effect caused by the actions of man. The prediction of future trends depends greatly on the understanding of the nature of the rise after 1970.

  24. #24

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    85

    Default Re: Global Warming

    As for the historical charts, using them is actually, to me, the most frightening proof of something wrong.!! According to Earths eliptical orbit we hit an ice age every 125,000 years with a roughly 10,000 year warm period inbetween which tails off to cooler times. We should be in that tail off period just now and yet the earths temp is rising. Why? We're not 100% sure but the fact is, it is rising when it shouldn't be!
    http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/...1-weather.html

    The heat and droughts of 2001 and 2002, and the unending winter of 2002-2003 in the Northeast have people wondering what on Earth is happening to the weather. Is there anything natural about such variability?

    To answer that question, researchers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) - right in the heart of New England's bad weather - took a look at how things have changed in the past 1,000 years. They looked at studies of changes in glaciers, corals, stalagmites, and fossils. They checked investigations of cores drilled out of ice caps and sediments lying on the bottom of lakes, rivers, and seas. They examined research on pollen, tree rings, tree lines, and junk left over from old cultures and colonies. Their conclusion: We are not living either in the warmest years of the past millennium nor in a time with the most extreme weather.
    This review of changes in nature and culture during the past 1,000 years was published in the April 11 issue of the Journal of Energy and Environment. It puts subjective observations of climate change on a much firmer objective foundation. For example, tree-ring data show that temperatures were warmer than now in many far northern regions from 950 to 1100 A.D.

    From 800 to 1300 A.D., the Medieval Warm Period, many parts of the world were warmer than they have been in recent decades. But temperatures now (including last winter) are generally much milder than they were from 1300 to 1900, the Little Ice Age.
    Nature still rules

    Does this mean that the present global warming is more a product of natural changes than of carbon dioxide emissions and other industrial regurgitations? Soon won't go that far. But he does say "there's increasingly strong evidence that previous research conclusions, including those of the United Nations and the United States government concerning 20th century warming, may have been biased by underestimation of natural climate variations. The bottom line is that if these variations are indeed proven true, then, yes, natural climate fluctuations could be a dominant factor in the recent warming. [The year 1998 was the warmest year on record, followed by 2002, then 2001.] In other words, natural factors could be more important than previously assumed."

  25. #25

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    85

    Default Re: Global Warming

    Oh here's one concerning the famous Hockey Stick graph!:
    http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/trc.html

    This page provides a guide to our work on replicating the "hockey stick" graph made famous by the 2001 IPCC Report. For those new to the subject here are some useful overview papers:
    A major investigation into the hockey stick, the Wegman Panel Report, was headed by Edward Wegman of George Mason University, also past Chairman of the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Theoretical and Applied Statistics. The Wegman panel not only fully endorsed our findings, but also presented a wide-ranging critique of the insularity of the paleoclimate community, their isolation from mainstream statistics, and their hostility towards external review and replication work. Wegman makes a good recommendations about the need for higher standards of disclosure and review scientific research is used in public policy.
    # The National Research Council Report on the hockey stick was released in June 2006. They accepted our argument that Mann's method is biased towards producing hockey stick-shaped PCs, that uncertainties have been underestimated and that the bristlecone data, on which the famous hockey stick shape depends, should not have been used. They also express very little confidence in the IPCC's claim about the 1990s being the warmest decade in the millennium. But you have to read the report closely to pick all these things up--they bury it in a lot of genteel and deferential prose.

  26. #26

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    85

    Default Re: Global Warming

    http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/econ-persp.pdf

    There is even less agreement on what constitutes “change,” which is why every time a forest burns or an iceberg calves someone asks: “Is this a sign of global warming?” Witness the apocalyptic thrill as seers and sages scan the skies for signs, omens and portents of global warming; but climate change is an elusive concept, and no one is sure what the thing would look like, even if it was already happening.
    This ambiguity is reflected in the two key documents that govern much of the thinking on this issue. The 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) defined “climate change” as follows:
    "Climate change" means a change of climate which is
    attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that
    alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which
    is in addition to natural climate variability observed
    over comparable time periods.
    (http://unfccc.int/index.html)
    The recent Third Assessment Report (TAR) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) defined it differently (http://www.ipcc.ch/):
    This is a very important difference: The IPCC is looking for signs of any change, whereas the policy instruments prescribed by the UNFCCC are not triggered unless it is a particular kind of change: that attributable to human activity. When IPCC officials declare that “climate change” is for real, this is about as informative as announcing that the passage of time is for real. Of course the climate changes: if it didn’t Winnipeg would still be under a glacier. But the fact that the last ice age ended doesn’t imply that the policy mechanisms of the UNFCCC should kick in. That’s the problem with the ambiguity over the term “climate change”—and it seems to trip up a lot of people—

  27. #27
    muxu bero bat! gogs67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    edinburgh
    Posts
    929

    Default Re: Global Warming

    People who disagree with the whole 'man made global warming' will be able to quote research from other people no doubt, to validate their particular stance, that's the way it is. What i don't get at all is their motives? . If things turn out to have been not as bad as thought what's the worst that happened, you recycled a bit more cardboard and glass than was strictly neccessary?
    Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty!

  28. #28

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    85

    Default Re: Global Warming

    Quote gogs67 View Post
    People who disagree with the whole 'man made global warming' will be able to quote research from other people no doubt, to validate their particular stance, that's the way it is. What i don't get at all is their motives? . If things turn out to have been not as bad as thought what's the worst that happened, you recycled a bit more cardboard and glass than was strictly neccessary?
    No not exactly, when a country is about to introduce a crippling carbon tax based on what can be false information, then it is much more than recycling a bit more cardboard...that is my motive. Global warming has become political (especially when when Al Gore is used a the poster child), and is being used as a tool to drain our already emptied pockets. My point is that it goes both ways. Of course I believe in living as green as possible, as most of those articles agree as well, but at what expense do we make these reductions if there is much debate as to what their harm really is. I can see the results of what eating meat does, therefore I stopped, however I do not necessarily believe that CO2 is the cause we all tend to think it is, all the while I shall continue to walk as much as possible, stop idling (I really never ever did anyway) the engine, I use a push mower, I've purchased energy saving bulbs, a front end loading washer...hell I could go on...

  29. #29
    muxu bero bat! gogs67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    edinburgh
    Posts
    929

    Default Re: Global Warming

    Can you explain these 'crippling carbon taxes' ?
    In Europe there have been taxes and levies on carbon emissions even prior to the 2005 Emissions Trading Scheme. Companies have dealt with it and adapted! If you live an already green lifestyle then these taxes shouldn't effect you too much.
    Just out of interest, WHY do you subscribe to a 'green' ethos if it's not to try and help reduce your detrimental impact on the environment?
    Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty!

  30. #30
    steven1222
    Guest

    Default Re: Global Warming

    Quote Vegabond View Post
    when a country is about to introduce a crippling carbon tax
    Crippling? Hardly! The negative aspects of it are greatly exaggerated by corporate polluters.

    based on what can be false information
    By the time everyone can be convinced that it is not "false information," it will be too late to do anything about it. Even if there were a 50% chance of it being "false information" (which there isn't), it would be worth while to take action to prevent the possibility of disasters.

    Global warming has become political (especially when when Al Gore is used a the poster child)
    That does not make it any less true.

    and is being used as a tool to drain our already emptied pockets.
    Most of the things a common person can do to reduce greenhouse gas emissions save money in the long-term, and some even save in the short-term. Rich corporations would be affected most by any formal policies on the subject.

    but at what expense do we make these reductions if there is much debate as to what their harm really is.
    The "debate" comes from biased pseudo-scientists, politicians, and the right-wing media. There is proof that carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere is directly related to air temperature.

    I can see the results of what eating meat does, therefore I stopped
    Yes, meat and dairy are part of the problem, because meat and dairy require more fuel use and also release significant amounts of methane. Yet, even if everyone went vegan next year, it wouldn't save the planet if they continued to use coal and oil for power and fuel.

    however I do not necessarily believe that CO2 is the cause we all tend to think it is, all the while I shall continue to walk as much as possible, stop idling (I really never ever did anyway) the engine, I use a push mower, I've purchased energy saving bulbs, a front end loading washer...hell I could go on...
    That's nice, and it helps, but unless people admit that CO2 is a threat to all life on earth, the planet is doomed.

  31. #31
    Pale & skinny Big Good Wolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The Enchanted Forest
    Posts
    113

    Default Re: Global Warming

    ...unless people admit that CO2 is a threat to all life on earth, the planet is doomed.
    First of all, the planet is not doomed. It will still be here long after all the humans have gone.

    The problem is that everyone, regardless of which side of the argument they are on, views it from a human perspective and in human timescales.
    Millions of years ago the land was covered in trees and the sea was full of plankton.
    When they died, they got buried, taking their carbon content with them, and turned in to coal and oil.
    Humans have recently been making a good job of getting this carbon out from under the ground and in to the atmosphere.
    This is almost universally regarded as A Bad Thing.
    The trees got the C in CO2 from the atmosphere. We are putting it back.
    Life on earth began possibly over 4 billion years ago and has survived through all sorts of atmospheric and oceanic extremes.
    Humans making the earth uninhabitable for themselves has very little significance inb the overall scheme of things.
    Worcestershire's fastest veteran vegan mountain bike endurance racer with a beard.

  32. #32
    I eve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    2,210

    Default Re: Global Warming

    hear hear! big_good_wolf.
    Eve

  33. #33
    muxu bero bat! gogs67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    edinburgh
    Posts
    929

    Default Re: Global Warming

    Quote Big Good Wolf View Post
    First of all, the planet is not doomed. It will still be here long after all the humans have gone.

    The problem is that everyone, regardless of which side of the argument they are on, views it from a human perspective and in human timescales.
    Millions of years ago the land was covered in trees and the sea was full of plankton.
    When they died, they got buried, taking their carbon content with them, and turned in to coal and oil.
    Humans have recently been making a good job of getting this carbon out from under the ground and in to the atmosphere.
    This is almost universally regarded as A Bad Thing.
    The trees got the C in CO2 from the atmosphere. We are putting it back.
    Life on earth began possibly over 4 billion years ago and has survived through all sorts of atmospheric and oceanic extremes.
    Humans making the earth uninhabitable for themselves has very little significance inb the overall scheme of things.
    But the question of Global warming is not what the earth will be like in a million years time but what it will be like in a hundred! It's not significant on a cosmic scale but it is on a human scale. Whether you agree with it or not the adaptability (and will) of humankind to survive is the driving force behind this.
    The fact that the Earth will be uninhabitable in a billion years anyway due to the increase in solar temperature as the sun expands does not stop the majority of people worrying about the world their children will live in!
    Whether they can be arsed to do anything about it though is a different matter................
    Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty!

  34. #34
    Mahk
    Guest

    Default Re: Global Warming

    Global warming seems to be a reality but the exact cause I'm not certain of. Looking at history over the past couple of centuries it would seem to me that the cause may be related to the world's pirate population:
    ARGH!

  35. #35
    Karma Junkie vava's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    South Yorkshire, England, UK.
    Posts
    876

    Default Re: Global Warming

    nice one Mahk!
    even perfect isn't perfect - Rubyduby 4th July 08

  36. #36
    Andy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Yorkshire
    Posts
    80

    Default Re: Global Warming

    haha yes that is a very significant theory
    I shall pray to his great noodliness for mercy.
    Arrrr!

  37. #37
    muxu bero bat! gogs67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    edinburgh
    Posts
    929

    Default Re: Global Warming

    Quote Mahk View Post
    Global warming seems to be a reality but the exact cause I'm not certain of. Looking at history over the past couple of centuries it would seem to me that the cause may be related to the world's pirate population:
    ARGH!

    But there was a jump in the pirate population between 1820 and 1860 and yet the GAT continued to rise which makes me think that pirates may not have as much to do with global warming as some may suggest!
    Traffic wardens however, have shown a sharp decrease in numbers since the Road Traffic Act 1991, this coincides with the large drop in CFC's measured in the atmosphere...........................I'll let you draw your own conclusions!
    Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty!

  38. #38
    Mahk
    Guest

    Default Re: Global Warming

    OK I thought I'd add a little humor to the thread but here's the real deal:


    We've only changed 1 degree C in the past 140+ years? That doesn't seem like much but heck what do I know. How do we know we don't change (naturally) by as much as, say, 5 degrees over a millennium, though? This extremely erratic line may be trending up over the past century, granted, but for all I know we may be looking at an isolated section of a millennial downward trend.

    Put it this way. Looking at the chart's red line, think of how people in 1910 would have panicked, for example: "Oh no, we are the coldest we have ever been since recorded history!! Soon the polar caps will engulf all our northern cities!"

  39. #39
    muxu bero bat! gogs67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    edinburgh
    Posts
    929

    Default Re: Global Warming

    This is quite an interesting, if dated,document from The Royal Society!

    http://royalsociety.org/downloaddoc.asp?id=1630
    Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty!

  40. #40
    Pale & skinny Big Good Wolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The Enchanted Forest
    Posts
    113

    Default Re: Global Warming

    Quote gogs67 View Post
    But the question of Global warming is not what the earth will be like in a million years time but what it will be like in a hundred!
    Either way, I'll be dead by then. What's the difference ?

    Quote gogs67 View Post
    ...the majority of people worrying about the world their children will live in!
    So don't have children. Problem solved.
    Worcestershire's fastest veteran vegan mountain bike endurance racer with a beard.

  41. #41
    muxu bero bat! gogs67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    edinburgh
    Posts
    929

    Default Re: Global Warming

    Quote Big Good Wolf View Post
    Either way, I'll be dead by then. What's the difference ?



    So don't have children. Problem solved.

    Sorry m8, i just cannae live like that.
    I suppose it's the same wi veganism, in the grand scheme of things it matters not a jot whether i eat 10 steaks a day or go shooting everything that moves, the animal will be dead anyway sometime. But i feel some kind of empathy wi ALL things, human or animal, and i'd hate to live with the guilt if my actions wronged either!
    And that's without a Catholic upbringing!lol
    Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty!

  42. #42

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Greater London
    Posts
    385

    Default Re: Global Warming

    Quote gogs67 View Post
    Sorry m8, i just cannae live like that.
    I suppose it's the same wi veganism, in the grand scheme of things it matters not a jot whether i eat 10 steaks a day or go shooting everything that moves, the animal will be dead anyway sometime. But i feel some kind of empathy wi ALL things, human or animal, and i'd hate to live with the guilt if my actions wronged either!
    And that's without a Catholic upbringing!lol
    Indeed. One day when my grandson is old enough to debate these issues I want to be able to look him in the eye and account for myself.
    From Sutton, Surrey, (or Greater London when they want to fleece me for the Olympics)

  43. #43
    snivelingchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Lafayette, Louisiana, United S
    Posts
    1,022

    Default Re: Global Warming

    TO me, it has little to do with human survival, but for the survival of all animals. It's not as simple as they'll be dead by then, at some point there will be animals and humans suffering when it is really bad, but while it is still habitable. Just think of the arctic creatures who are suffering now because of less ice area for them to live on.

  44. #44
    Mahk
    Guest

    Default Re: Global Warming

    As I walked pass a Greenpeace solicitor on the street today she tries to strike up a dialog with, "Care about global warming, the earth, or polar bears?" I responded, "No, I hate all those things; polar bears killed my parents!" I'm 99% sure she could tell from my tone I was just joking with her and was really just politely declining in a funny way she could then tell as a funny war story to all her cronies.

    As an aside I thought to point out that polar bears are indeed dangerous. Unfortunately when trekking across the arctic tundra most consider a gun a necessary tool for self defense because polar bears consider us "dinner". At least that's what I've heard.

  45. #45
    Mahk
    Guest

    Default Re: Global Warming

    The stranded polar bears on a melting iceberg photo was a cheap ploy of Gore etc to appeal to our love of cuddly creatures. What the photo doesn't show is that they were in no danger and were a short swimming distance from other safe areas. The woman who took the photo, Amanda Byrd, was not under the impression that they were in danger at all.




    [YOUTUBE]Uw5WdmuGSfM[/YOUTUBE]

    I'm still taking a neutral view regarding global warming. As I mentioned earlier documenting that global warming is occurring in no way proves what causes it or that we aren't just on the upward slope of the naturally occurring oscillating variations of all sorts of trends. If this chart is accurate it looks like hydrocarbon use has nothing to do with it:


    Here is the paper it comes from which has similar charts showing trends in sea level increases and global glacier shrinkage also seem unrelated to human activity. I have no idea who to believe and who not to. I'm keeping and open mind.

  46. #46
    Qaxt
    Guest

    Default Re: Global Warming

    I'm wobbling between the two positions, but it's sort of like veganism. There are people that argue that animal products are unhealthful, but there are people that say they're in the middle or healthful (but most everyone says plants are good).
    If you were to make a logical assumption, you would take the vegan side.
    Plants are good.
    Animals are either good or bad, all benefits can come from plants (if good).

    Basically, you have little or nothing to lose from giving up animal products, but a lot to lose if you don't.

    Similarly, if you work to save the environment, you lose little or nothing (and you're still making the Earth a healthier place!), but if you don't, there's a fair chance that you have a lot to lose.

    So even if you don't believe in global warming, you probably shouldn't try to convince others it doesn't exist or continue environmentally unfriendly practices.

  47. #47
    muxu bero bat! gogs67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    edinburgh
    Posts
    929

    Default Re: Global Warming

    Quote Mahk View Post
    . I have no idea who to believe and who not to. I'm keeping and open mind.
    I'm glad.
    Too many folk are denying the link with humans outright, and it's just too big a thing to get wrong IMO.
    Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty!

  48. #48
    gorillagorilla Gorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sussex, UK
    Posts
    3,925

    Default Re: Global Warming

    Quote Qaxt View Post
    Basically, you have little or nothing to lose from giving up animal products, but a lot to lose if you don't.

    Similarly, if you work to save the environment, you lose little or nothing (and you're still making the Earth a healthier place!), but if you don't, there's a fair chance that you have a lot to lose.
    i agree.
    'The word gorilla was derived from the Greek word Gorillai (a "tribe of hairy women")'

  49. #49

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    85

    Default Re: Global Warming

    Fact:
    June 2008 the coolest (perhaps third coolest) June in 40 years. July was even worse...if the earth is warming, I'd hate to be here when it's cooling down

  50. #50
    muxu bero bat! gogs67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    edinburgh
    Posts
    929

    Default Re: Global Warming

    Quote Vegabond View Post
    Fact:
    June 2008 the coolest (perhaps third coolest) June in 40 years. July was even worse...if the earth is warming, I'd hate to be here when it's cooling down
    See, if that's worldwide then here's the first article i looked up for 2008 weather patterns and it disputes that!
    http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capit..._far_this.html

    I do know Scotland had the warmest May on record ever this year but local weather patterns arn't really important on the World scale!
    Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty!

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Feb 17th, 2009, 12:06 AM
  2. Why eating less meat could cut global warming
    By gertvegan in forum Human evolution and environmental issues
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Nov 20th, 2007, 12:25 PM
  3. Richard Branson offers $25m global warming prize..
    By Poison Ivy in forum Human evolution and environmental issues
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Feb 19th, 2007, 02:19 PM
  4. Global warming 'past the point of no return
    By StmpyElephant in forum Human evolution and environmental issues
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Sep 18th, 2005, 12:50 PM
  5. George W and global warming
    By eve in forum Human evolution and environmental issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Dec 27th, 2004, 07:14 AM

Tags for this thread (If you see one or more tags below, click on them if you're looking for similar threads!)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •