I am very confused from all the contradicting nutritional information about raw food out there. I enjoy the taste of raw food and I feel very good when I consume it too, but I'm not sure if it's placebo or not.
I know that we're able to more easily break down some things when they're cooked. I know that some things have higher nutritional content when they're cooked or canned, carrots for example. But then there are other things that might be lost.
Even though some things can't be eaten raw or have higher nutritional value when cooked, should we even be considering these things as proper food in the first place? Should we be consuming them anyways? (i.e. potatoes)
I want to know why and how raw is better for me, because I would do it 100% if it was actually benefitial to my health to go 100%.
CoNfUzZleDnESs!
Thank you for helping me
Bookmarks