Maybe the real 'big' picture here is to see what they actually promote, how they work, which effect they (and Ingrid Newkirk) have on people etc, so a list showing the quantities of what they do here may have the opposite effect of what they want for people who disagree with their profile.
Whenever I look at something on Peta's various web pages, I see something which just doesn't make sense.
Their forum has less members than ours... isn't that strange if they actually have 2 million (!) members?
If I spend a minute imagining what could be done for the vegan cause with all the people and funds Peta has, the only conclusion I come to is the the best thing that could happen with Peta would be if the organization dissolved, meaning that all these people could invest their work and contributions to a real vegan group.
I also looked at something their wrote about B12 the other day, and found that they promote the usual nonsense about B12 (if not absorbed from animal products) being absorbed from
dirt, feces and
insects.
This stunt must be very high on the list of Peta's many attempts of pushing people away from them. It's like they're trying hard not to be taken seriously by average people - which is a tragedy given that Peta is the largest pro-vegan organization in the world. I wonder if they actually discuss such stunts (her will) and make a collective decision on whether it's a good idea to do this within the Peta 'sphere' or not, or if Ingrid Newkirk just tells other that she'll do it, and makes someone put it up on Peta's site?
Bookmarks