Both parties are correct Korn.
Abortion imposes death (a very significant imposition?) on the body of an unborn human.
Pregnancy imposes the consequences of sex (pretty severe, admittedly) upon the bodies of those who have chosen to indulge in it.
Meat eater mentality and abortion on demand mentality are fundamentaly identical: Both believe that their own personal right, not just to live, but to live as they wish, overides the right to life of 'others'.
The style of argument for meat eaters and pro abortion on demand is also fundamentaly identical: Both ignore similarities and exploit whatever differences they can find to isolate their 'victims' into sub-categories by which their right to life can be overidden by the arguers right to his/her personal lifestyle choices.
We don't expect agreement when we (as vegans) argue against the lifestyle choices of those who want to kill animals?
Similarly pro-lifers do not expect agreement when arguing against lifestyle choices of those who want to kill unborn humans.
Bookmarks