I have started this thread because I was wondering if there are other people on this forum who are as cynical as me about 'naturopathy'.
Veganism is not popular in naturopathic circles at the moment, probably due to the fact that everyone is raving about the Atkins diet ): From my own experience, many naturopaths base their philosophy around what is popular in the most recent editions of women’s magazines or the results of some dubious 'scientific' study.
Take Vitamin C for example, a study caried out a few years ago revealed that this ‘wonder vitamin’ has anti-ageing properties. The naturopath’s response: prescribe hundreds of dollars of Vitamin C pills to vulnerable people who are scared of growing old. Of course, a few years later a new scientific study emerged that questioned the health benefits of large doses of vitamin c, so the naturopaths adapted their philosophy accordingly.
I went to see a naturopath who told me to go on the Atkins diet even though I was not in the slightest bit overweight. When I told her I was vegan she looked at me with disdain and told me that I would 'die eventually'. Some months later I returned and she suggested that I go on the blood type diet and as I am blood type A, I should consider going vegetarian!!!!
There are some good naturopaths out there and I am sure that some of them share this forum. However many of those good naturapths adopt a tried and tested holistic philosophy such as ayurveda and TCM etc. Some naturopaths do succeed in combining different philosophies and mange to make a pragmatic assessment of modern empirical research BUT naturopaths like that are few and far between. Indeed many are dogmatic and will not take your code of ethics into account when prescribing a diet. It is after all much easier for a naturopath to tell you to eat meat than to sit down and tell you about vegan sources of amino acids and omega 3 etc.
Do not be fooled by the name, choosing a naturopath is a dangerous game of Russian roulette.
Bookmarks