No, my actions would not be inconsistent, but the message could be.
Unless ALL animal farming was done away with, there would be a world with two parallel "meats"; one produced in a lab, and another otherwise idential product produced with a once live animal. I can easily see how a message about not needing animal products to thrive and thus being able to only relate to animals in a non commodifying manner could be confused as long as the two parallel "meat" products co-existed.
It's similar to the reasoning why I won't wear leather or wool, even if it is second hand and the suffering has already happened. Or why I won't eat dumspstered animal products.
I just don't need them, and the reason TO consume them is mostly for pleasure. While the need for that social/political consistency is not terribly important (I do think it's fine to wear fake leather or fur), it is enough to override whatever small pleasure I might gain from being less consistent with my abstinence from "ethical" meat (I can't believe I typed that last line).
I think I related to this above.
Without the social or political context, I think it may be fine to eat that "meat". Unless heavily subsidized, I don't see how it would be economically or ecologically sustainable (as growing cell tissues still have to get rid of metabolic waste and consume huge ammounts of plant protein), but disregarding that barrier, as long as two parallel system existed in a social context, I think it would be best to avoid consumption of "ethical" meat.
Now... on a deserted island, with no social context to think about, it's fine. If I *had* to consume meat to survive, then eating the one produced in the lab would be the only choice as well. Luckily, I don't think you were reducing your question to such narrow terms.
I have the same policy in my house about NIKE products. Nike is just as bad as Addidas or anyone else, but I won't buy Nike because of the fact that they are so associated socially with sweatshops and Union-busting, that I don't want to muddle my effectiveness of my political messag by wearing Nike products. That's also why if I'm Union organizing, I also make sure to drive a US-made car, even if other non-US made cars are made by unions as well. It's all about the political context when we can afford to make those choices.
Bookmarks